Wednesday, August 31

Encouragement

I was looking for some encouragement this morning, and I got on Walk in the Word's website when I went to their daily devotional. What I found was amazingly applicable to my situation this week! God knew what I needed to hear. I hope it can encourage/chasten some of you also!

In other news, I added a few more links to new blogs that have started and dormant ones that have come back to life. :)

HOW TO DRIVE OVER A CLIFF
By Dr. James MacDonald

Whoever heeds instruction is on the path to life, but he who rejects reproof leads others astray. Proverbs 10:17

We’re in Driver’s Education mode at our house. Two of our kids are fairly new drivers, one will soon be sitting behind the wheel. Parents know that the number one command to a new driver is what?—“Slow down!” Kids may get tired of hearing it, but wisdom merits its repetition.

What’s true in driving is also true in life. When life is going in a bad direction, a whole line of people ignore the warning, stick the pedal to the metal, and drive over a cliff. Too many times I’ve stood at the bottom of some ravine where someone ran the guardrail in their life and everyone around them is devastated.

Today’s challenge is neither an encouraging or instructive message—it’s a warning. Some of you are driving way too fast. You’re not dealing with some unresolved issues in your life and you’re headed for the cliff.

That’s the warning Herod needed to heed in Mark 6. Herod had some serious unresolved issues in his life yet he loved to hear John the Baptist preach. At every opportunity John would warn him of consequences but Herod would just sit there, amused. Maybe in a moment of honesty he would have said, “I know I should deal with it but I’m just too busy.” Herod’s story ended very badly as you can read about it in Mark 6:14-20.

Now I’m not particularly concerned about Herod; he’s already in eternity. But we’re all still here, and we have choices to make. Please hear this as a warning if it applies to you:

If there’s a conflict in your marriage, begin to deal with it today.
If you’ve got a son who has the wrong friends, deal with it today.
If you’ve got a secret sin that’s persisting in your life, deal with it today.
If the backdrop of your spirituality is a lot of defeat, shame, and frustration, and your spiritual life is really just a façade, could I plead with you? Deal with it!
If you have a bitter, unforgiving spirit toward someone, and there’s hatred in your heart—please, deal with it!

This is a hard word but please hear my heart. If you stay in that in-between place, the time is coming when you will choose the wrong. I’ve seen it in my life and in helping others; when that moment comes we think we’ll step on the brakes, but instead we say, “I’m doing it,” and we hit the gas and over the edge we go.

Slow down and ask for God’s discernment and courage to heed the warning signs.

Tuesday, August 30

Some Changes

Due to someone posting pretty vicious comments on my blog, I will now only be allowing comments during hours when I'm sitting at my computer. That way I can immediately see when something offensive is posted and remove it. If I don't happen to get it removed in time, I apologize. I hope no one quits reading this blog because of this. I would love it, if you have a comment, if you'd email me with it. I really love to read your comments and it's a big reason why I blog. I'd love it if the offender didn't take that from me.

Othewise, just try and post during business hours. I'm sorry folks. I really wish it wasn't this way, but I'm doing my best to minimize any exposure to offensive materials.

Monday, August 29

Congrats to Plattner and Bekah

First off, I'll try and keep some of my posts a little shorter from now on due to some constructive critisim I recieved last week. (Apparently some people who read this have a mild case of ADD.) Love ya all! ;)

I don't know if that's how you spell Bekah's name or not. If not, I'm sorry. Aaron Plattner got engaged to Bekah Kauffman this weekend. I pray that God will grant them much wisdom as they grow into a relationship with one another.

My week of abstinence from my home computer is over. It was a good week. I did confess to some people that it probably wasn't the best week for me to do this experiment, since Ash is living with me. Having him around changes how much time I would've spent on the computer anyway, so it probably skewed the results a little.(as if this was highly scientific in the first place eh?)

Main conclusion: I spend too much time on the computer right before bed. I would probably get an extra half hour to an hour of sleep if I wouldn't get on right before bed.

Secondary conclusions:
I can cope quite well without checking on the Cardinals everyday.
I don't get all that much email after work hours.
I don't need to get on my computer just because I have "nothing else to do".
I always have "something else to do".

On to other news:
I went to see FFH this past weekend. We had to drive over an hour to No-where, Illinois (aka Princeton). It was a good time though. The lead singer has a TON of energy. He reminds me of my best friend in H.S. who had a band. Also, if you're planning on going to a concert sometime, I would highly recommend taking Jake Gerst! That guy is a blast at concerts! Seriously.

Friday night Washington Y.G. had a bible study on contentment. I learned that the Greek word for contentment is translated as sufficiency other places in scripture. That put a new spin on the definition of contentment for me. As we grow into realizing that God, and God alone, is completely sufficient for EVERYthing, we will naturally grow into contentment. How many other things is it "natural" to search for sufficiency in? I could name a few of mine, but I'm betting you have a few of yours also. Lets strive, today, to put all those things aside and focus on Christ as our ultimate sufficiency. Paul learned to be content regardless of his physical circumstances. He realized that this life is not about "this life". It's about a relationship with God and His Son that is totally independant on physical circumstances.

Friday, August 19

A Life Unplugged

I think I'm going to do a personal experiment. I'm going to go one week with my home computer turned off. Granted I do not plan on making that permanent, but I am curious as to how this will affect my life. I'm hoping it will give me a new perspective on the time I spend on my computer and strengthen my resolve to use that time for edification. I already recognize that I use my computer a lot, and I also realize that my time on the computer is used in a variety of ways some constructive and some not so much. What I hope to gain is a better appreciation for the amount of time that I spend on the computer so that I will be more disciplined in my usage.

Does that make sense?

Anyway, here's a copy of the article that inspired this all. :)

Enjoy!

A Life Unplugged

by Kara Schwab

I believe I am the last human in America who does not own a cell phone. People ask me for my cell number all the time. You should see their faces when I tell them I don’t have one.
“What do you mean?” they’ll usually say, thinking they didn’t hear me correctly.

“I don’t own a cell phone.” I say again, trying to sound as normal as possible.

“You don’t own a cell phone?” they repeat in utter disbelief.

“I don’t own a cell phone,” I say a smidge slower, over-ennunciating my words so that I’m extra clear.

“Wow. You don’t own a cell phone.” They’ll undoubtedly repeat again, shaking their heads as if I just told them I was homeless. “Huh. That’s ... wow. How do you do it?”

“Do what?” I ask, playing dumb to their dumb question.

“I mean, how do you survive?” they ask with total sincerity, as if living without a cell phone is like living in the desert without any water.

To be honest, I wonder if sometimes my life would be easier with a cell phone. But then I wonder what exactly an “easier” life means. People would be able to reach me at any time of the day or night. So really, life would be easier for other people if I had a cell phone. I think my life would just be busier.

As it is, my home phone rings off the hook. Have you ever tried having a serious conversation on the phone with two toddlers trying to climb your legs as if they were tree limbs? If you were a fly on my wall, you’d hear my side of a phone conversation go something like this:

“Oh, wow. I am so sorry to hear that. That must be—hang on a second—get off the table now and first take the scissors out of your mouth—I’m sorry you were saying? Hmmm. That’s rough, wait, one more sec—I am on the phone and yes, as soon as I’m off I’ll make you some popcorn—Boy, I’m sorry, you were saying? Oh yes, that’s just awful. What can I do to help—Wait. Absolutely not, you may not ride your tricycle nude. Put your clothes back on this minute—I’m sorry, I’m back. Yes, that must be so hard for you.”

Needless to say, in this season in life, I don’t really enjoy talking on the phone. It actually makes life harder for me. Email—now that’s the best way to reach me. So my friends tell me I should get a hand held raspberry, blueberry—some sort of electronic berry thing that is portable that allows you to check your Email. Initially, I thought this could be a good idea. But when I’m out and about, do I really want to be checking my Email? Can’t my Email wait? Can’t yours?

Dietrich Bonhoeffer wrote about this in The Cost of Discipleship in the early part of the last century; clearly a prophetic warning: “Earthly possessions dazzle our eyes and delude us into thinking that they can provide security and freedom from anxiety. Yet all the time, they’re the very source of all anxiety.” Of course, when he wrote that in 1937, he wasn’t thinking of cell phones or Email or electronic raspberries. Yet how true his words are today in reference to technology. It’s amazing how these gadgets were created to enhance life, but often, people end up feeling oppressed by them.

In his book, Freedom of Simplicity, Richard Foster writes, “The pace of the modern world accentuates our sense of being fractured and fragmented. We feel strained, hurried, breathless. The complexity of rushing to achieve and accumulate more and more frequently threatens to overwhelm us.”

I don’t know about you, but I can relate to feeling breathless. And sadly, what takes my breath away most of the time isn’t a sunset or my husband’s handsome face, but the 15 new Email messages or the eight new voicemails I have.

I remember a couple years ago feeling breathless one night because I was trying to get my girls into bed quick so I wouldn’t miss a show on TV. I was angry when I realized I missed half of it. But sitting there on the couch, I started to hear the whisperings of the Holy Spirit asking me if this was the best use of my time. How did this pull of TV’s mindless entertainment become stronger than my desire to read one more book to my little girls? I felt so ashamed.

Neil Postman in his book, Amusing Ourselves to Death, writes about the dangerous distraction of television, saying, “In the age of technology, spiritual devastation is more likely to come from an enemy with a smiling face than from one whose countenance exudes suspicion or hate. …When a population becomes distracted by trivia, when cultural life is redefined as a perpetual round of entertainments … then a nation finds itself at risk; culture-death is a clear possibility.”

My husband and I decided to pull the plug on our television that night. The first few days felt like I was going off crack-cocaine. It was tough. But soon I didn’t miss it at all. I loved the extra time I had. What would you have time to do if you turned off the TV? What if you filled that time with doing nothing? Or with being still before God?

Charles Spurgeon was a mighty British minister in the late 1800s. I keep a copy of his book, Spurgeon’s Gems, on my desk. The following “gem” relates to this concept of being still: “Some persons say they cannot bear to be an hour in solitude; they have got nothing to do, nothing to think about. … Let me give him the word Jesus, and only let him try to think it over, and he shall find that an hours is naught, and that eternity is not half enough to utter our glorious Savior’s praise.”

If Spurgeon thought that back then people couldn’t stand to be silent for an hour, I bet he’d think people today couldn’t handle being still for five minutes. I’m not even sure if I’m able to hold the same train of thought for five minutes. My prayers often sound like this: “Lord, teach me Your will. Help me to follow your plan. To really focus on You … Wait, did I defrost the chicken?”

But unlike those in Spurgeon’s time, solitude is difficult to grasp not because we have nothing to do, but because we have too much to do. Too much to think about. Too many technological tools and gadgets reminding us.

Solitude is hard to come by. It must be intentionally sought after. It may require unplugging some things where you live. And even when you do, embracing solitude is a disciple that may take some getting used to. I keep Brother Lawrence’s book Practicing the Presence of God on my nightstand. It’s full of insights into praying without ceasing and learning to be silent before God. I must say, I’m still learning, because usually, I find myself practicing the presence God right into snoozeville. Note to self: do not attempt to be still before God while horizontal.

Finding a balance with technology is key. If it can enhance your life without overwhelming it, you’re good to go. But it can’t hurt to take a break from it now and then. Send a letter instead of an Email. (Believe it or not, stationery is still sold in many stores). Talk less on the phone and more in person. Turn off the TV and read a book. Spend less time on iTunes and more time singing to God. Take a sabbatical from surfing the Net and try being silent before the Lord of Lords. Be still and call upon Him now. You don’t even need a cell phone.

Thursday, August 18

Thursday

Warning: I don't have a specific topic in mind as I begin this post. :)

Probably the main thing on my heart today is my love and thankfulness for the Washington church. As I listened to Ron Messner deliver the sermon last night, (Wednesday) I was overwhelmed with gratitude that the Lord has blessed me with such a wonderful church. Our pulpit's ability to exhort to holy living through a pure heart that loves God, while staying clear of legalism, is amazing! In many evangelical churches the desire to avoid legalism has led them to the point where, statistically, the born-again Christians live the exact same lifestyle as un-believers. One of the biggest weakness in Christ's church today isn't its theology, but rather it's apparent unwillingness to live out and practice that theology. If all the born again Christians in America actively pursued a holy separate lifestyle we would turn the world upside-down! What a testimony to God's changing power!

Dr. James MacDonald, from Walk in the Word, has a wonderful set of CD's out entitled No More Games. They address living and breathing the holiness of God. Wow! Talk about an uplifting and pertinent message! Read and meditate on Isaiah 6. It's this coming face to face with the Lord that turned Isaiah into the most incredible prophet in the Bible. He spoke moral uprightness and holiness to the most powerful men in Israel during a time of great moral decline. He preached holiness to 4 separate kings over a period of forty to sixty years. He was a pillar of God. He got to observe the magnificent and infinite holiness of God. In the face of that, his own uncleanness and the Israelites uncleanness became extremely apparent to him. The angels that worshipped the Lord covered their face and their feet. May our lives be about the holiness of God through His grace.

Justin Koch, in the closing comments last night, mentioned how our reactions to life's situations, through grace, are often, and I quote, "Diametrically Opposed" to what the world would expect. He is such an engineer! It even comes across in subtle and not-so-subtle ways in his sermons! :)

I'm headed out to Leo this weekend for the annual Gateway Woods benefit auction. I'm going to be volunteering. I get to carry quilt racks and help out with the computer stuff.

Well, it looks like I found something to write about huh? ;)

Wednesday, August 17

Inclusive Love


Singleness: A Reflection of the Love of God
Author: Wendy Widder

One of the pervasive themes of Scripture is God’s love for His chosen people, the Israelites. He selected them from among all the nations of the world to be His own, established a covenant with them, and vowed His faithfulness to them.

Throughout the writings of the Old Testament prophets, this relationship between God and His people is expressed in the metaphor of marriage. Israel, the bride, spurned God and prostituted herself with other gods, and yet because of His covenant, God’s love for her endured. In the New Testament, marriage images the relationship between Christ and the Church.

Marriage provides a beautiful reflection of some of our most treasured spiritual truths. It pictures genuine commitment and unconditional love in a world of no-fault divorce, and it provides the framework for our concepts of spiritual birth and the Family of God.

What could singleness possibly add, if anything, to this array of rich images? What can a life devoid of lasting romance contribute to an understanding of holy love? Perhaps it merely serves to amplify the beauty of marital love, much like a dark sky enhances the splendor of a rainbow or a Hollywood villain magnifies the goodness of the hero. Or maybe it’s a grand test that, if we pass, we get to move on to the higher ground of wedded life.

Or maybe it’s none of these. When understood properly, the picture of singleness can help round out our concept of the love of God. While marriage illustrates what we can call the exclusive nature of God’s love, singleness allows us to better understand the inclusive nature of God’s love.7

Generally speaking, singles have a freedom in relationships that married people don’t have. They are free to befriend and love many people without being unfaithful to any of them. I can be friends with men and women alike and not worry about being disloyal to my spouse — although I must always be careful not to give someone else’s spouse the opportunity to be disloyal. I am able to invest in a wide variety of relationships without cheating a husband out of the time that is rightfully his. It is this freedom that portrays the inclusive dynamic of God’s love — the fact that the gospel message is open to all who will receive it.

While marriage is designed to illustrate the restrictive nature of God’s covenant love for His people, singleness can beautifully display the treasured truth that God’s love is open to all. His relationship quotient is never filled —there’s always room for one more. Because the friendships that singles form are not restricted in the same way that those of married people are, singles “reflect the openness of God’s love that seeks to include within the circle of fellowship those yet outside its boundaries.”1

We must never forget that the message of love in the gospel has two sides. God jealously guards and provides for His own. He chastens us as children. He reserves space for us in His everlasting kingdom. We are precious in His sight. However, if we overemphasize His exclusive love we start to think like elitists in a special Christian club.

God is also always seeking the outsiders so that they, too, can be enveloped by the fellowship of the Christian community. If, however, we overemphasize God’s inclusive love, we start to think that God is just a nice guy who will accept everyone, whether or not they believe in Him. Both sides of this mysterious love must be kept in balance, even tension. The complementary natures of marriage and singleness can help the church picture this difficult task.

Original Article can be found here.

Tuesday, August 16

GUESS WHAT!!

Yeah...Work has been slightly crazy, and by crazy I mean insanely busy, and by insanely busy I mean I can't believe I'm typing this right now, and by not believing...ok, that's enough.

I'll be back someday.

Wednesday, August 10

Neat Photos!

SYDNEY, Australia -- Swinburne University of Technology's center for micro-photonics have constructed a model of the Sydney Opera House, see photo above, that is about half the diameter of a human hair. It is more than a million times smaller than the real Sydney structure. The model was built from a hybrid material of glass and polymer by firing intense laser light into the matter in a liquid state to create what to the human eye appears as an almost imperceptible dot, but under an electron microscope it contains the detail and the beauty of the iconic Sydney harbour side structure. (07/23/04 AP-Swinburne University)


MILLAU, France -- People look at the Millau bridge, the world's tallest traffic bridge. Construction workers have nearly completed work on the roadway of the bridge, a viaduct that soars over a valley in southern France. The bridge, reaching about 270 meters (890 feet) at its highest point, will be inaugurated by President Jacques Chirac on Dec. 14 and opens to traffic on Dec. 17. (12/09/04 AP photo)


TAIPEI, Taiwan -- In this photo released by the Taipei 101 Building, a display of fireworks celebrate the New Year. Known as "Taipei 101," the 1,679-foot high building, which some liken to a giant bamboo shoot of glass and steel, is named after its number of floors. The structure boasts some of the world's fastest elevators. They travel 3,333 feet a minute and can go from the fifth floor to the 89th floor in 39 seconds. (01/01/05 AP photo)

Hitachi, LTD.'s new 8GB Mikey drive is shown with dominoes to demonstrate its smaller profile. Mikey is a new miniature hard drive from Hitachi that can store several thousand songs or pictures in 8 GB of storage. (01/06/05 AP photo)

Tues night V-Ball

Another great Tuesday night out at Jeff's. A few of us guys ate supper at Busy Corner before we went to play volleyball. I had a piece of caramel apple pie for desert. Wow! That's all I've got to say about that.

It was great to have Kenton around for an evening. He's headed out to Leo this morning. He'll be there for a couple of weeks volunteering at Gateway. He rode out with Ashley Esslinger.(Who is now an official "Illinoisian"!) He picked up a car from Mangolds and drove it out to Leo this morning. It's no more Saturn for Kenton. He's on to bigger and better things in the form of an '01 Ford Explorer. It's definitely sharp.

Ashley is moving into our basement today. He had his car loaded down yesterday! It'll be good to have that guy around. He's going to start work at Mangolds and go to school at Parkland in Champaign. It's a COOP program so he'll be at school 8 weeks and then at Mangolds for 8 weeks. He's going to be a Ford service tech.

There's a good chance I'll have some great stories to blog in the future, now that Ash is living with me.

Btw: That explorer isn't Kenton's. :) His doesn't have the 20" dubs.

Tuesday, August 9

Wasp's nest


Understanding Intelligent Design
by: Dr. Tony Beam

This weekend I discovered a huge nest of wasps who had decided they really liked my front porch. Since the danger that many stinging insects posed was a real danger I decided they had to go. I poured half a glass of gasoline, stood a safe distance away and threw the gas at the nest. My plan would have been huge success if I had actually hit the nest but all I managed to do was anger and stir up the wasps. They flew off in all directions looking someone, anyone to sting. I barely escaped only to return later after they had settled down and this time I successfully sent them packing.

The moral of the story is if you want to stir up a wasp nest just throw gas in their general direction without hitting them. If you want to stir up a nest of liberal scientists who believe Darwinism is more of a religion than a reliable theory just suggest that the universe might have come into being some other way.

When President Bush suggested Intelligent Design be taught in the public school system along side Darwinism, the liberals went off in every direction looking for someone to sting. Paul Krugman of the New York Times flew immediately in the direction of the nearest "creationist" accusing them of pretending to be engaged in science. He warns that the "political muscle of the religious right, may be enough to start a process that ends with banishing Darwin from the classroom."

It might be a good idea for Paul Krugman and other liberal pundits to do their homework before they consider any questioning of Darwin to be nothing more than right wing religious posturing. Recently in Greenville South Carolina a group of well-respected scientists came together for a forum titled, "Uncommon Dissent: Scientists Who Find Darwinism Unconvincing." These scientists had at least three characteristics in common. First, many of them were world renowned in their field of expertise. Second, they all agreed that Darwinism for purely scientific reasons is not a plausible theory, and finally not one of them claimed to be an evangelical Christian.

Biochemist Dr. Michael Behe author of the book, "Darwin's Black Box" made a compelling case for intelligent design by using Darwin's own words against him. Darwin once concluded "If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down." What Darwin was saying was that if there existed an organism which was "irreducibly complex" (that is to say it could not function without all of its parts working together) his theory would be disproved.

Since 100 years ago Darwin had no way to see inside a living cell he thought that cells were extremely simple...nothing more than a blob of protoplasm. Today we know that each living cell is an irreducibly complex molecular machine that simply could not have evolved piece by piece. Even when you consider the flagellum, which is attached to some bacteria like a tail, you have to marvel at the complexity of its design. The flagellum operates much like a tiny propeller requiring dozens of precisely tailored, intricately interacting parts which just could not have evolved in a piece by piece fashion.

When I speak about the Christian Worldview I often touch on the importance of realizing the majesty and complexity of the world we live in. I often use the illustration of a family traveling to South Dakota for a vacation where their children see Mt. Rushmore for the first time. They would probably excitedly ask something like "Mommy, Daddy, how did the faces of those presidents get up there on the mountain?" I think even our children would look at us incredulously if we answered them by saying, "Billions of years ago the forces of erosion started working on the face of Mt. Rushmore and after a million years of the water doing its work four president's faces popped out of the mountain." I always end by saying where there is evidence of design there must be a designer.

Dr. Norman Geisler sums up the intelligent design argument by asking, "If you walked in the kitchen and saw your name and address spelled out on the kitchen table would you think the cat knocked over the alphabet cereal box?" Random chance can account for simple changes in nature and may explain the development of simple organisms. But complexity cannot be a result of random chance and random chance is a linchpin in Darwinism.

Before Paul Krugman dismisses any dissention from Darwinism he might want to consider the persecution faced by radical scientists like Copernicus who dared to challenge the popular theory that the world was the center of the universe. That same persecution today is reserved for those who would dare question Darwin's conclusions. Maybe, just maybe someday the courageous scientists of today who would question the doctrine of Darwin will be respected as those who led us out of intellectual darkness. Regardless of who wins the current debate between evolution and intelligent design God will have the final word and His word is "In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth."

Monday, August 8

What can I do?

What follows is a long article taken from crosswalks's website. I guess what struck me was that the majority of non-believers out there have never been invited to church. Wow...people might say it's really hard to share their faith...or hard to witness or whatever, but to just invite someone to church? How hard is that? The article is long, but I know I was blessed by reading it. What a great reminder that we should not be complacent in our view toward the un-saved. It is not an issue of our comfort or status. It's an issue of heaven and hell, both of which are very very real.

Enjoy

The Unchurched Next Door:
A New Look at the Challenge

Thom Rainer thinks that most Christians have no clue about how unchurched people really think. Given Christianity's mandate for evangelism, this represents a big problem.

Rainer is founding dean of the Billy Graham School of Missions, Evangelism and Church Growth at The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary. Over the past decade, he has emerged as the nation's leading expert in church growth and evangelistic strategies. In a very real sense, Rainer operates in two different worlds, with one foot in academic research and the other firmly planted in the local church.

In The Unchurched Next Door, Rainer and his research team consider the real issues involved in reaching unchurched Americans. His findings will surprise many Christians--including many pastors--and offer vital insights as the church looks forward into the twenty-first century.

The Unchurched Next Door represents a massive research project based in a national survey. From the onset, Rainer was determined to force Christians to look at the unchurched all around them. "Most of the unchurched are your neighbors, your coworkers whom you know well, and even your family members," he explains. "That is why we call them 'the unchurched next door.' They have much in common with us. Many of them have your moral values. Most are not antichurch or antireligion. They are very much like you--except that they are lost without Christ."

After interviewing thousands of unchurched Americans, the Rainer research team looked for patterns in the profiles. Based on the results, Rainer suggested five different levels of responsiveness to the gospel. "U1" identifies unchurched Americans who are highly receptive to hearing and believing the good news. They know something about Christianity, and have a positive attitude toward the church. "U2" individuals are receptive to the gospel and willing to hear a message from the church. Those categorized as "U3" are identified as neutral, "with no clear signs of being interested, yet perhaps open to discussion." The "U4" group demonstrates resistance to the gospel but no antagonism. The most unresponsive group in the population is identified as "U5" The most secular Americans are "highly antagonistic and even hostile to the gospel."

Given the contours of post-Christian America, many believers would assume that the U5 category would include a large number of our fellow citizens. That assumption is not sustained by the facts. Rainer's research indicates that the U5 category fits only about five percent of the American population. Most unchurched Americans are grouped in the central three categories. Those already friendly to the church, the U1s, comprise eleven percent of the population, serving as something of a bookend to the U5s.

The majority of the unchurched fit the middle categories, with 27% listed as U2, 36% as U3, and 21% as U4. As Rainer summarizes, "Most of the unchurched are not antichurch or anti-Christian." By and large, they have had little contact with Christianity, and are not highly motivated when it comes to issues of faith and belief.

In reviewing the research, Rainer and his team came to some surprising conclusions. First of all, most Americans have never been invited to church--never. Yet, 82% indicated that they would be at least "somewhat likely" to attend church if invited. As Rainer comments, "Only twenty-one percent of active church goers invite anyone to church in the course of a year. But only two percent of church members invite an unchurched person to church." He concludes: "Perhaps the evangelistic apathy so evident in so many of our churches can be explained by a simple laziness on the part of church members in inviting others to church."

One of the most devastating insights drawn from the research is the fact that most unchurched Americans feel themselves safe from the evangelistic reach of believing Christians. They do not sense that Christians are seeking actively to share the gospel with them, and many nonbelievers are actually wondering what makes Christians so reticent to talk about their faith. Furthermore, most of the unchurched indicate that their Christian friends have little actual influence on their lives.

The withdrawal of men from participation in many churches has led a good many researchers to believe that men are most highly resistant to the gospel. This is also born out by a great deal of experience in local churches. Nevertheless, Rainer's research indicates that most men are grouped in the middle categories, and show relatively low levels of interest in the gospel--either positive or negative. Indeed, this research indicates that unchurched Americans classified in U5--the most antagonistic category--are more likely to be women. As a matter of fact, women tended to predominate in both U1 and U5, perhaps indicating that women are more likely to place a high value on the issue of faith, and thus tend to be more passionately Christian or secular.

Unsurprisingly, Rainer also discovered that the U5s tend to be more highly educated, more wealthy, and more condescending toward the Bible than other Americans. This group is marked by an anti-supernatural bias combined with a secular lifestyle. One woman interviewed for the project said simply, "I have no need for the Bible. The Bible was written for very simple people. It was written to give moral and ethical guidance to uneducated people".

The Unchurched Next Door is a serious look at a serious problem. The undeniable fact is that America's churches are falling behind in the challenge of evangelism. The best data available indicate that the percentage of the population active in Christian churches has failed to grow in even a single metropolitan area in the United States over the last twenty years. More to the point, churches have failed to grow even at a pace that would equal the growth of the population in general. America is being transformed into a secular society at a pace that would shock most Christians--if they ever cared to look.

Thom Rainer is a specialist in church growth, and he clearly wants to help churches to grow--both numerically and spiritually. At the same time, however, he wants to make certain that it is the church that grows, not merely a crowd or voluntary associciation. He is a powerful advocate for expository preaching and clear Gospel proclamation.

For that reason, he gives serious attention to theological issues at stake. Specifically, Rainer identifies a creeping inclusivism in the pews, combined with a growing disbelief in Hell among the public, as sources of evangelistic malaise.

Inclusivism, the belief that personal faith in the Lord Jesus Christ is not fundamentally necessary for salvation, has been growing among some Christians for decades. Driven first by liberal theologians who intentionally sought to redefine the faith, inclusivism now fits the cultural mood, and allows Christians to claim simultaneously to be believers in Christ and to deny the gospel.

As Rainer claims, "belief in inclusivism goes completely against the teaching of Christ and Scripture. The Bible teaches exclusivism, the belief that explicit faith in Christ is the only way of salvation." The impact of creeping inclusivism is obvious. "Why should one go to the trouble of sharing Christ when that person can be saved without placing explicit faith in Christ? Why waste your time?"

The denial of Hell is another issue that diminishes concern for evangelism. The denial or redefinition of Hell is now found among many who claim to be Christians, and Hell has disappeared almost entirely from the public consciousness of the nation. Today's Christians should note that Jesus himself was bold to warn sinners that they should fear Hell and understand its very real and pressing threat. Far too many Christians see Hell as an embarrassment rather than as a motivation for sharing the gospel.

Most helpfully, Rainer points to an array of evangelistic touch points that Christians should seize for the cause of the gospel. After all, most of these unchurched Americans are living all around us. Their children play with our children on the playground; Christians and non-Christians work together in the business world; and we all live in neighborhoods filled with persons who desperately need to hear the gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ.

A simple conversation with our neighbors will help to reveal their own disposition toward the church and the Gospel. Nevertheless, we should not assume that one who fits the U5 category is further from the reach of the gospel than those who seem to fit U1. The fact is that every single unbeliever is united in an absolute and unconditional need for the gospel. Furthermore, there is a basic antagonism between belief and unbelief.

We cannot predict who will respond to the Gospel. Often, those who appear most likely to respond never do so. At the same time, many of those who are most antagonistic to the church and to the gospel, do come to Christ. This is an important reminder to us that every single conversion is a miracle of God.

The Unchurched Next Door will prompt much thought and should move every thoughtful Christian toward greater faithfulness in evangelism. This book will also help us to understand our unchurched neighbors. Who are they? "They are the unchurched next door. They are your friends, your neighbors, your classmates, your coworkers, your merchants, your acquaintances, and your family members. They need Christ. And they are waiting to hear from you." What are we waiting for?


If you would like to read the article in it's original post it can be found HERE.

Friday, August 5

Romans 12:15

"Rejoice with them that do rejoice, and weep with them that weep. "

Have you ever been blessed with a friend with whom it's completely natural to do what that verse says? When they share a struggle in their life, it's almost as if you're struggling with it too. When they share a heart ache, it literally makes your heart ache too. You want to help them...do something...but all you can do is gently remind them of things they already know...and they often seem to know it better than you.

When they share a joy, your heart leaps with them.

James 1:3-5
1:3
Knowing this, that the trying of your faith worketh patience.
1:4
But let patience have her perfect work, that ye may be perfect and entire, wanting nothing.
1:5
If any of you lack wisdom, let him ask of God, that giveth to all men liberally, and upbraideth not; and it shall be given him.

May this, too, bring you towards a fuller and deeper understanding of...and communion with Christ Jesus our Lord. All things in a believers life are orchestrated to conform him to the image of Christ.

Thursday, August 4

small effort

I went through and cleaned up the side bar of links to friends who rarely update. Hopefully that will make the list of links a little more pertinent.

Balancing Ourselves

Kristi's post has a great balancing thought to my last post. Thanks Kristi!

Wednesday, August 3

Catching On!


Blogging is growing every second
Blogs are becoming more important. There are ever more blogs, ever more postings and most notably ever more visitors. Meanwhile blogs are gaining editorial importance. And also the advertising market is moving to blogs.

As CBS states a new report by Technorati found that a new blog is created almost every second. End of July Technorati was tracking 14.2 Million weblogs. 55 % of these blogs are active an 13% are updated at least weekly. David L. Sifry, founder and CEO of Technocrati, says on CBS: "If the numbers continue going the way that they are, you should expect to see close to 30 million blogs by March of next year and should be seeing 2 million posts a day." In the report on Technorati Sisry states that also the volume of postings grew steadily: "... at the end of July 2005, there were about 900,000 posts created each day. That's about 37,500 posts every hour, or 10.4 posts per second."

And the visits to blogs seem to increase as well. According to Brandrepublic Hitwise, a online monitoring fim, found that one in every 200 web visits are to blogs. This constitutes a 130% increase over the last year. The BBC writes that "much of their appeal has been boosted because readers can subscribe to them, for free, to stay updated of any new posts automatically."

Brandrepublic states: "Bloggers are increasingly breaking stories before the mainstream media or being used to exert pressure on the mainstream media. Recently stories by bloggers led to the saking of Dilpazier Aslam" (see also former posting). The BBC points out: "Blogs have played a part in highlighting issues that journalists have not covered. They have also proved to be a valuable communication channel for journalists in repressed countries who have no other publishing means."

The advertising market is moving too. Today Yahoo started testing a system that "will let it place ads on Web site of bloggers" reports the New York Times. Google reached out to bloggers already two years ago. PaidContent states that "Yahoo's new service will differ from Google in that it will add human editorial to the selection of ads for content pages. In comparison, Google's service relies on technology."

Love Feasts!

I didn't get near enough sleep last night. I went and did the normal Tuesday night Volleyball thing at Jeff's, and I didn't get home till 11:40pm!(Thanks to Cody's persistence.) I'm literally still getting sand out of my eyes! For real! I got up this morning and I had sand grit in the corners of my eyes, and just now I rubbed my eye and another grain was found...this one hurt, it was up under my eyelid. Yeah, so anyway, Joe Knochel called while I was playing volleyball, and it turns out we're both free on the weekend of August 13-14. I think he might come to Illinois and hang out with me! Yeah, very cool.

So I read 1 John 5, 2 John, and 3 John this morning. Before you think I did a 5 hr devotion remember that 2 & 3 John are one chapter books. Anyway, it really struck me how John was all about the love! Love toward God, love toward Christ, love toward our brothers, just love in general! I looked up "love" in the concordance to see which Greek version he was using. It varies.

Sometimes he uses Agapao, which, as it pertains to people, means to welcome, to entertain, to be fond of, and/or to love dearly. Sometimes he uses Agape, which means brotherly love, affection, good will, benevolence, or love feasts. I love that last one! Love feasts. Is that not a cool definition of agape? Obviously the two words are closely related, yet they have subtly different meanings.

2John 1:5-6 is a good example of the two different usages of "love".

5 And now I beseech thee, lady, not as though I wrote a new commandment unto thee, but that which we had from the beginning, that we love (Agapao) one another. 6 And this is love (Agape), that we walk after his commandments. This is the commandment, That, as ye have heard from the beginning, ye should walk in it.

Do you think it's significant that he uses "Agapao" when talking about one another and then switches to "Agape" when talking about keeping God's commandments? It may not be. In St. John 22:37-39, when Jesus is telling the pharisee's the first and second greatest commandments, he uses Agapao both time there. One time it refers to God and the other time to your brother.

ANYway, it's about the love folks!

Tuesday, August 2

Quotes

The mathematical sciences particularly exhibit order, symmetry, and limitation; and these are the greatest forms of the beautiful.
--Aristotle (384-322 BC) Metaphysica

I don't believe in mathematics.
--Albert Einstein

Do not worry about your problems with mathematics, I assure you mine are far greater.
--Albert Einstein

A mathematician is a blind man in a dark room looking for a black cat which isn't there
--Charles R. Darwin

The trouble with some women is that they get all excited about nothing -- and then marry him.
- Cher (I love this one!)

My Personal Favorite! This guy definitely has an attitude problem and would do well to read the last quote in this list! :)
Anyone who cannot cope with mathematics is not fully human. At best he is a tolerable subhuman who has learned to wear shoes, bathe and not make messes in the house.
--Lazarus Long, "Time Enough for Love", (Robert A. Heinlein)

Kind words do not cost much. They never blister the tongue or lips. They make other people good-natured. They also produce their own image on men's souls, and a beautiful image it is. --Blaise Pascal (1623-1662)

1=0?

The following is a "proof" that one equals zero.

Consider two non-zero numbers (Any number except zero) x and y such that

x = y.
Then x^2 = xy.
Subtract the same thing from both sides:
x^2 - y^2 = xy - y^2.
Dividing by (x-y), obtain
x + y = y.
Since x = y, we see that
2 y = y.
Thus 2 = 1, since we started with y nonzero.
Subtracting 1 from both sides,
1 = 0.

What's wrong with this "proof"?


For you "math majors" out there this should be relatively simple.

Monday, August 1

Googolplex

A googolplex is the number 10^(10^100) (or 10^10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000, 000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000, or 10googol), that is, 1 followed by a googol zeroes. The term googol was coined by Milton Sirotta, nephew of mathematician Edward Kasner. Googolplex was coined by Kasner to define an especially large number by extension from his nephew's idea.

A googol is greater than the number of particles in the known universe, which has been variously estimated from 1072 up to 1087. Since this is less than the number of zeroes in a googolplex, it would not be possible to write down or store a googolplex in decimal notation, even if all the matter in the known universe were converted into paper and ink or disk drives.

Thinking of this another way, consider printing the digits of a googolplex in unreadable, 1-point font. TeX 1pt font is .3514598mm per digit, which means it would take about 3.5 * 1096 meters to write in one point font. The known universe is estimated at 7.4 * 1026 meters in diameter, which means the distance to write the digits would be about 4.7 * 1069 times the diameter of the known universe.